Prediction of Philip Sekulic [366th] vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong [175th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead To Head: Sekulic 2 - 0 Wong
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sekulic winning 4 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Sekulic and Wong was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Second, Hard with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Philip Sekulic | 2 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 0 |
| Sekulic | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 366 | Ranking | 175 |
| 225 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 21 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (111-88) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-109) |
| $92,390 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Philip Sekulic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:25:17 | Average Match Time | 1:25:17 |
| 64% (74/115) | 1st Serve % | 65% (86/133) |
| 73% (54/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (61/86) |
| 56% (23/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (16/47) |
| 38% (8/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 42% (56/133) | Return Points Win % | 33% (38/115) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Philip Sekulic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sekulic 2 - 0 Wong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sekulic has won 42.3% of points on their second serve, while Wong has won 48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sekulic, in recent form, has won 44.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 42.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.49% and 23.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sekulic has saved 51.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 55.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sekulic has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 20), with Wong winning 51.35% (W/L 38/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 115/ 80), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sekulic winning 2 times and Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sekulic winning 4 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Sekulic and Wong was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Second, Hard with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sekulic and Wong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sekulic winning 1 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sekulic winning 0, and Wong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sekulic has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.83 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 250.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sekulic has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sekulic has converted 29.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 23.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Philip Sekulic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Best Odds For The Match
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Philip Sekulic
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-0 6-7(6) 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yuta Shimizu
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Alexander Blockx
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
23
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Kohei Hayashi
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Philip Sekulic
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Naoya Honda
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Sekulic vs Wong?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Sekulic Vs Wong is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (111/88) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/109) |
| 55% (257/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/267) |
| 52% (2350/2142) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2848/2721) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 789 | Aces Total | 1313 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 544 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:50:47 | Average Match Time | 1:30:18 |
| 270.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 252.57 |
| 62% (8503/13754) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9161/15252) |
| 70% (5936/8503) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6480/9161) |
| 51% (2655/5251) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2947/6091) |
| 41% (560/1366) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1447) |
| 39% (5345/13616) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5962/15383) |
| 57% (110/194) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/243) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 48% (36/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (45/81) |
| 51% (36/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 85% (112/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 14% (112/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 18% (87/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (119/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
