Philip Sekulic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Sekulic vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Philip Sekulic

AUS

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

520

C. Rank

151

225

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$92.4K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

520

C. Rank

151

225

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$92.4K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Head-to-head: Sekulic 2 - 0 Wong

They have played 5 sets in total, with Philip Sekulic winning 4 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1. The last match between Philip Sekulic and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sekulic	2
Wong	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Yokkaichi Challenger(11-28-24)

Stats

Philip Sekulic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

(R1) Chicago Challenger(07-22-24)

Stats

Philip Sekulic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

P. Sekulic vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

P. Sekulic	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$92,390	Career Prize Money	$538,970
55.51% (131-105)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
2	Hard	0
0	Titles	2
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

P. Sekulic vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Philip Sekulic has won 42.25% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Philip Sekulic, in recent form, has won 45.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.25% and 23.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Philip Sekulic has saved 50.70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Philip Sekulic has won 54.05% of matches played (W/L 20/17), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Philip Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 4/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Philip Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/14), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Philip Sekulic winning 2 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Philip Sekulic winning 4 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1.
The last match between Philip Sekulic and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:17.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Philip Sekulic has played against opponents with an average rank of 340.35 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.05.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Philip Sekulic has won 90% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Philip Sekulic has converted 30.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Philip Sekulic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Sekulic vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Sekulic	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
26	Games Won	16
0	Aces (Total)	11
8	Total Double Faults	4
1:25:17	Average Match Time	1:25:17
64% (74/115)	1st Serve %	65% (86/133)
73% (54/74)	1st Serve Win %	71% (61/86)
56% (23/41)	2nd Serve Win %	34% (16/47)
38% (8/21)	Break Pts Won %	100% (3/3)
42% (56/133)	Return Points Win %	33% (38/115)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Sekulic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Playford Challenger - 24-11-2025
QF Dane SweenyD. Sweeny	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Bernard TomicB. Tomic	W	3-6 7-6(4) 6-4	Stats
R1 Cruz HewittC. Hewitt	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Sydney Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Alex BoltA. Bolt	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Emile HuddE. Hudd	W	6-3 2-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Sekulic vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Sekulic	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
55.51% (131/105)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
54.28% (298/251)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
51.88% (2746/2547)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
57.14% (116/87)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
45.45% (10/12)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
25.00% (1/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
57.14% (4/3)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.37	Aces Per Game	0.52
945	Aces Total	1687
0.26	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
660	Total Double Faults	603
1:49:54	Average Match Time	1:31:40
435.06	Average Opponent Rank	371.21
63% (10278/16371)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
69% (7122/10278)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
50% (3049/6093)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
42% (659/1574)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
39% (6300/16083)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
50.00% (3/3)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
48.70% (56/59)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
64.49% (69/38)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
56% (130/231)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
49% (42/85)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
56% (45/80)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
87% (127/110)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
13% (127/16)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
19% (109/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)